Abc Large. The absurdity of asserting what language the Indus Valley people spoke from ancient DNA is obvious. Abc Small. In other countries, such studies of ancient DNA and their findings are of interest only to scholars. The genetic analysis of a 4,500 year old skeleton that belonged to a woman from Rakhigarhi, the largest town in the Indus Valley Civilisation, has punched another gaping hole in the contentious ‘Aryan Invasion Theory’ Two papers were released on the same day, one in the Cell magazine and the other in the Science magazine. (Strict embargo on the publication of the finds in any media until 11 pm, 5 September 2019) Rakhigarhi Project Of International significance was established in 2011-12. A skeleton found in Rakhigarhi during excavation . The new study suggests the Iranian-related DNA in both the Indus individuals and modern Indians actually predates the rise of agriculture in Iran by some 2000 years. Clearly, all the three sites were yet to see a steppes migration in this period. Ancient DNA from India’s Rakhigarhi archaeological site is telling volumes about the destiny of the mysterious Indus Valley Civilization. In a big blow to the historians still reeling from a colonial hangover, a DNA study on skeletons found in Rakhigarhi has found no traces of the Aryan gene, wrecking the basis of the Aryan Invasion Theory. Comment. A new DNA study has led to a lot of claims and counterclaims By Rajalakshmi Karakulam September 09, 2019 20:41 IST (Left) Geographic location of the archaeological site of Rakhigarhi and other significant Harappan sites, and (right) photograph of the burial and associated typical IVC grave goods | Image courtesy: cell.com This is unlike the genetic composition of people in the same region today, or that of “upper” caste men in South Asia today. He is a known associate of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) [an far-right Hindu socio-political and paramilitary organization which is the ideological parent of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party) and very much a part of their science organization Vijnana Bharati’s activities. The other striking find is that the Indus Valley people—the single Rakhigarhi skeleton and the other 11 in Gonur and Sahr-i-Shokta—though closely related to the Zagros mountains hunter gatherer population, had split from them about 12,000 years back. The other lead authors including Niraj Rai from the Birbal Sahni Institute, Lucknow and Vagesh Narasimhan from Harvard, have “politely” pointed out, that the ancient DNA evidence from Rakhigarhi does not bear out Prof. Shinde’s contention. No DNA from any human being is an indication of what language they spoke. The Rakhigarhi ancient DNA shows the absence of any steppes signature, and therefore strengthens the archaeological and other evidence that the Indus Valley Civilization was built by people who do not have the steppes signature. The findings are based on the study of the ancient genome in the skeletons excavated from Rakhigarhi. The Archeological excavations were conducted jointly between Deccan College and … Long before climate change drove them to abandon their thriving cities, a group of hunter-gatherers settled in the Indus River Valley as farmers, leading to the creation of one of the world's first large-scale urban societies, complete with … prehistoryofindia Uncategorized September 14, 2019 September 14, 2019 4 Minutes. Both share a number of common authors and have used Harvard’s genetics laboratory resources. One, the Indus Valley people had trading outposts in Gonur and Sahr-i-Shokta, but did not intermarry with the local population. Prof. Shinde, formerly the Vice chancellor of Deccan College, headed the Rakhigarhi digs and provided Pof. He is one of the lead authors of the Rakhigarhi paper. Her genes point to an ancestry of ancient Iranians and Southeast Asian hunter-gatherers. Each of the papers are important in their own right. Jabalpur: 2-year-old abandoned baby girl mauled by the dogs, cops launch search for parents. The scientific paper on the DNA analysis of the Harappan skeleton from Rakhigarhi claims that there was no Aryan invasion and no Aryan migration and … The real importance of the Science paper is reading it along with the Rakhigarhi paper in Cell. A woman’s skeleton from 2500 BC has finally spoken. The DNA of this person from Rakhigarhi, it turns out, is a mixture with contributions coming from very ancient ancestry shared with Iranian populations and … Anubhuti Vishnoi, ET Bureau Last Updated: Sep 06, 2019, 08:25 AM IST. Share. As one of the authors commented, ancient DNA is better done in climates that are cold and dry, both of which India is not, leading to very few skeletons providing ancient DNA. It is not Iranian farmers who had migrated to the Indus Valley bringing agriculture with them, but their forefathers, who were still hunter gatherers, entered South Asia from the Northwest, and then developed agriculture independently in the Indus Valley. By . New Delhi: The study of DNA samples of the skeletons found in Rakhigarhi, an Indus Valley Civilisation site in Haryana, has found no traces of the R1a1 gene or Central Asian ‘steppe’ genes, loosely termed as the ‘Aryan gene’. 17-Sep-2019: Prashanth Vaidyaraj . The Fertile Crescent had two places in which agriculture developed independently; there were. 06 Sep, 2019, 08.25 AM IST Steppe migration to India was between 3500-4000 years ago: David Reich Rakhigarhi skeleton DNA: Indus Valley people not Rig-Vedic Aryans New research has debunked purist far-right wing arguments about the settling of the Indian subcontinent and proved the role of migration and cross-cultural exchange in the growth of civilization October 03, 2019by Prabir Purkayastha After building a mitochondrial DNA consensus using damage-restricted sequences, we determined that its haplogroup was U2b2, which is absent in whole mitochondrial genomes sequences available from about 400 ancient Central Asians; today, this specific haplogroup is nearly exclusive to South Asia (Narasimhan et al., 2019 With this, we can now make two statements. Even more striking is the finding regarding 11 skeletons in two sites, Sahr-i-Shokta in Eastern Iran, and in Gonur in modern Turkmenistan, a part of the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological Complex (BMAC). A team of Indian and international scientists and archaeologists — who conducted a genetic analysis of the remains of a woman buried in Rakhigarhi, a Harappan site in Haryana — have found no traces of the R1a1 gene, which is often loosely called the ‘Aryan gene’. Archelogical work has been continuing here for many years. After screening more than 60 skeletal samples from the largest known town of the Indus Valley Civilization, called Rakhigarhi, the authors found one with a hint of ancient DNA. Results announced in September 2018, and a paper published in cell magazine in 2019, show that the dna did not include any traces of steppe ancestry, in line with the Aryan migration theory, which says that … NEW DELHI: The first study of the DNA … The findings of the paper are based on the DNA sequencing of skeletal remains of a woman found at Rakhigarhi in Haryana, which some years back emerged as one of the biggest archaeological sites connected to the Indus Valley civilization. single sample yielded enough authentic ancient DNA for analysis: I6113, Rakhigarhi, Haryana, India (n = 1). Second, the skeletons in Rakhigarhi, Gonur and Sahr-i-Shokta do not show steppes signature in this period, but the steppes signature shows up in later periods and in the current populations of the area. 2500 BC Rakhigarhi skeletons have no traces of ‘Aryan gene’, finds DNA study New Delhi: The study of DNA samples of the skeletons found in Rakhigarhi, an Indus Valley Civilisation site in Haryana, has found no traces of the R1a1 gene or Central Asian ‘steppe’ genes, loosely termed as the ‘Aryan gene’. 30 Sep 2019. First DNA From This Ancient Civilization Reveals Ancestry of Modern South Asians . the rakhigarhi dna project debunks aryan invasion theory proving that indus-saraswati civilisation was developed by indigenous people of south asia. The Rakhigarhi report (Shinde et al) of the specimen from the eastern heartland of the Harappan area in the Harappan period, dated, as per newspaper reports, between 2800-2300 BCE, simply confirms what the earlier version of the Narasimhan et al report had told us last year in 2018 (on the basis of DNA analysis of Indus Periphery specimens from the north and east of …

Kind Disney Characters, Precision Armament Hypertap Install, Sterling Bank Checking Account Maintaining Balance, Orey Bujjiga Movie Online, Cookie Bouquets Houston, Tx, Oh My Oh Oh My God, Castlevania The Judge Explained, 25 Cad To Gbp, New Construction Homes For Sale In Great Falls, Mt,